Re: Support for multiple calling conventions

[Corinna Vinschen <vinschen at redhat dot com>]

On Apr 11 08:19, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:52:31PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > - The return_value functions get the function type as argument,
> >   not the value type.  They have to retrieve the value type from
> >   the function type themselves.
> > 
> > - The return_value functions get an addition function type argument.
> > 
> > - The return_value functions get an addition `unsigned calling_convention'
> >   argument.
> 
> IMO adding the function type is best.  It's more extensible than
> adding a calling convention argument which most platforms won't need,
> and it changes the signature so that no one will get confused which
> type is passed.

Thanks.  I'll implement it this way next week.  It's just a pity that
so much code has to be touched for such a rather tiny addition...


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen
Cygwin Project Co-Leader
Red Hat