This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: GDB stub question?
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 03:32:25PM +0530, Inder wrote:
> Hi Daniel
> Thanks for your responce. The problem was with the signals received
> from the target which promoted the inf to abort.
> I do have another question, now GDB for single source stepping
> receives control after every instruction step. This makes single
> stepping very slow if you have a slow serial interface.
> Is there any way we could revert back to the old way (i.e)
> - set breakpoint at the next address
> - continue
> - remove breakpoint.
GDB has never done this to implement source single stepping, so I don't
know what you want. You can't predict the next address that far ahead;
what if the current line contains a branch?
You might want to look at the T packet response if you aren't already
using it; supplying a few registers there can make stepping much