This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: MI and pending breakpoints

 > > It's also arguable that for -break-insert you ALWAYS want "pending"  
 > > to be "on".

 > That's how annotate=2 works. However, I think GDB should query the user
 > the same way it does from the CLI. 

and

 > Here is the situation I'm talking about. When the user types 'b
 > file:line' in the console that the FE provides them, and they do not get
 > a query back from GDB when using annotate=2. It simply always set's the
 > breakpoint. I don't know if MI currently works the same.

AFAICT -annotate=2 doesn't change the behaviour of setting breakpoints.
After all, its just CLI with markup, not a separate interpreter like MI.


-- 
Nick                                           http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]