This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: ARM RDI

From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
Cc: Simon Richter <Simon dot Richter at hogyros dot de>, Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org>, GDB <gdb at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 09:54:07 -0800
Subject: Re: ARM RDI
References: <438B8FAD.1020804@codesourcery.com> <1133259214.32658.36.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> <20051129134436.GA22387@nevyn.them.org> <438C6192.10109@hogyros.de> <20051129142714.GA23172@nevyn.them.org>

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

> There are a number of other ways to use RDI besides rdi-share.

Indeed.

Some of the board vendors also ship GDB<->RDI converters.  As you say, I
have very little confidence that the current rdi-share actually works
with most things.

If consensus has been reached to remove rdi-share, may I post a patch
for review?  Or, if we don't think we can get that consensus, how about
at least a patch to make it a configure-time option, off by default?

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark@codesourcery.com
(916) 791-8304

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ARM RDI
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

References:
- ARM RDI
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: ARM RDI
  - From: Richard Earnshaw
- Re: ARM RDI
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: ARM RDI
  - From: Simon Richter
- Re: ARM RDI
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]