This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: gdb runs multi-threaded with non-threaded app and gets SEGV

From: "Min Xu (Hsu)" <xu at cs dot wisc dot edu>
To: Larry Martell <larry at software-horizons dot com>
Cc: gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 18:03:59 -0500
Subject: Re: gdb runs multi-threaded with non-threaded app and gets SEGV
References: <20050715212943.GA7686@cs.wisc.edu> <20050715222451.42369.qmail@web52009.mail.yahoo.com>

On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 Larry Martell wrote :
> --- "Min Xu (Hsu)" <xu@cs.wisc.edu> wrote:
> 
> > Larry,
> > 
> > How about you run the program and let the program
> > pass the
> > lib call without using GDB. And spin there until gdb
> > is attached?
> 
> I tried this, but after it attaches to the process,
> as then I try to continue it, it immediatly gets
> a SEGV. And it sounded like such a good idea too :-(

How can this be possible is beyond me. :-(

Are you using SPARC? One thing may or may not have something to do
with this is "non-faulting loads" in SPARC. Maybe, without
gdb, your program didn't SEGV since it was using
"non-faulting loads"?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gdb runs multi-threaded with non-threaded app and gets SEGV
  - From: Larry Martell

References:
- Re: gdb runs multi-threaded with non-threaded app and gets SEGV
  - From: Min Xu (Hsu)
- Re: gdb runs multi-threaded with non-threaded app and gets SEGV
  - From: Larry Martell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]