Re: Formatting of function pointer value

[Nick Roberts <nickrob at snap dot net dot nz>]

 > >  > Ok, the the only advantage of MI is stable output format.
 > > 
 > > I've not said that.  It also uses variable objects, it aims to be
 > > asynchronous...
 > 
 > Could you give more details? Basically, Daniel suggested that I use MI
 > instead of CLI.

I think thats sound advice.  If you use CLI for KDevelop (?) and then GDB
developers change the CLI output, it will break things for you and you'll have
wasted a lot of effort.

 > I've asked about the reasons why I should, and if possible, I'd like to see
 > all reasons, with a easy to understand descriptions.

I don't think you'll get that.  GDB is a voluntary project.  You just have
to work with what's available (or pay someone).

 > For example, the term "variable objects" says nothing to me, and it's
 > description:
 > 
 >    For the implementation of a variable debugger window (locals, watched
 >    expressions, etc.), we are proposing the adaptation of the existing code
 >    used by `Insight'.
 >
 > does not sched might light either.

I've learnt what I know about variable objects from using Insight, reading
the manual and looking at the source code.  I still don't understand the
asynchronous operation which only works under limited conditions.

 ...
 > >  > For example, looking at the code that prints function values (what
 > >  > worries me in the first place):
 > >  > 
 > >  >    fprintf_filtered (stream, "{");
 > >  >    type_print (type, "", stream, -1);
 > >  >    fprintf_filtered (stream, "} ");
 > > 
 > > I don't understand the point of the example.
 > 
 > The point of the example is that this code seem to be executed both in MI
 > and CLI modes. So, if '{' is changed to '(', it will equally affect MI and
 > CLI, which makes me wonder why MI is more stable that CLI.

If you are going to generalise the whole of MI and CLI from this one very
small example, then I can see that it would make you wonder why MI is more
stable that CLI

 > As you can see from my other post, the formatting of value is indeed the
 > same for MI and CLI.

Yes, but you can easily parse the MI output and replace '{' with whatever
you want.

Nick