This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Problem building GDB on Power64

From: Michael Chastain <mec dot gnu at mindspring dot com>
To: eliz at gnu dot org, pgilliam at us dot ibm dot com, cagney at gnu dot org
Cc: gdb at sources dot redhat dot com, drow at false dot org
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 16:16:58 -0400
Subject: Re: Problem building GDB on Power64
References: <200409020920.53975.pgilliam@us.ibm.com><20040902172158.GA15192@nevyn.them.org><200409021052.04994.pgilliam@us.ibm.com><20040902175859.GA16559@nevyn.them.org> <41376B47.70405@gnu.org>

Here's an idea from gcc:

gcc has a directory named INSTALL with a file 'specific.html', which has
info organized by target.  If we had a file like that, then that would
be the natural place for describing build choices like -m32 and -m64.

It would also be a good place for the section of PROBLEMS that
are about build failures and their workarounds.

I'm not strongly pounding the table for this, just pointing it out.
What do y'all think?

Michael

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Problem building GDB on Power64
  - From: Eli Zaretskii

References:
- Problem building GDB on Power64
  - From: Paul Gilliam
- Re: Problem building GDB on Power64
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: Problem building GDB on Power64
  - From: Paul Gilliam
- Re: Problem building GDB on Power64
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: Problem building GDB on Power64
  - From: Andrew Cagney

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]