This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hi, > I already asked this several times before, but I got no answer: > Does the upcoming gcc work correctly with gcc 3.x gereated executables > or does the "ignore breakpoints in constructor" bug still exist. > A more polite question would work . I tried out your stuff with g++ version 3.2 as well as cvs head for today using gdb cvs head also. Attached are the session logs. It works for me over here.It would be better if you could do something like this. > If yes, when it´s estimated to be fixed? me thinks it is already fixed. Maybe I am using a wrong test case but one would not know. . A proper test case would definitely help. So maybe you can send a better test case and hope for a reply. > > I think all linux developers need this to work with gdb reliabely! All C++ developers need this to work with gdb reliably would be a better way of putting things. > > regards > > Michael > cheers ramana ---- Ramana Radhakrishnan Codito Technologies
Attachment:
session
Description: Binary data
Attachment:
sessionlatest
Description: Binary data
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |