This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

RE: gdb supports dwarf2 which is generated by ADS compiler?


I am concerned for not reading my words because they are below replys.

I wrote as

 As Trace32 debugger can also read the elf file which is 
 generated by ADS,
 I think the elf file is not far from DWARF spec.
 
 But ADS debugger(adw) can not read gdb's elf file.
 I am curious that gdb can support DWARF spec correctly.

 Anyway, I just have one question.
 does gdb support this particular output from ADS?
 (I don't think DWARF generated by ADS is not correct.)



> -----Original Message-----
> From: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com 
> [mailto:gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com] On Behalf Of Jang, Jaewoo
> Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 1:06 PM
> To: 'Michael Eager'
> Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
> Subject: RE: gdb supports dwarf2 which is generated by ADS compiler?
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks for your response.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Michael Eager [mailto:eager@eagercon.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 2:15 AM
> > To: anocean@aromasoft.com
> > Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
> > Subject: Re: gdb supports dwarf2 which is generated by ADS compiler?
> > 
> > 
> > Jang, Jaewoo wrote:
> > > I try to debug elf dwarf2 format whcih is generated by ADS 1.0.1
> > > compiler. It seems that gdb support dwarf2 spec. But ARM 
> > dwarf2 spec
> > > is somehow modified from drawf2 spec. This is the reference of ARM
> > > dwar2 spec. 
> > http://www.linuxbase.org/spec/refspecs/dwarf/ARMDwarf2.pdf
> > 
> > 
> > The ARM document specifies how their compiler generates
> > DWARF. They describe the choices which they make, as well as 
> > the very minor areas in which they diverge from the DWARF 2 
> standard.
> > 
> > > I want to know whether gdb will support ARM dwarf2 
> format, or it is 
> > > possible to patch gdb that support ARM dwarf format.
> > 
> > There is no ARM DWARF 2 format, as such.  DWARF is permissive
> > -- it allows compilers to generate more or less information.  
> > The ARM document does what few other compilers do: explain 
> > what choices they made and their rationale.
> > 
> > On the other hand, if a compiler generates DWARF which
> > diverges from the standard, one has to expect that a debugger 
> > will have trouble interpreting it.  I don't think that ADS 
> does this.
> > 
> 
> As Trace32 debugger can also read the elf file which is 
> generated by ADS,
> I think the elf file is not far from DWARF spec.
> 
> But ADS debugger(adw) can not read gdb's elf file.
> I am curious that gdb can support DWARF spec correctly.
> 
> > If you have a specific question (i.e., "does gdb support this 
> > particular output from ADS?" or "is this particular DWARF 
> > generated by ADS correct?"), then you will more likely get a 
> > more specific response.
> > 
> 
> Anyway, I just have one question.
> does gdb support this particular output from ADS?
> (I don't think DWARF generated by ADS is not correct.)
> 
> > > Now I try to understand source codes that is part of reading elf 
> > > format. It is hard to understand. :(
> > > 
> > > please help me.
> > > 
> > > Sorry for my bad writing. 
> > > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> > > Let's get rock.
> > > +82 (2) 3284-2463 anocean@aromasoft.com
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Michael Eager	 Eager Consulting     eager@eagercon.com
> > 1960 Park Blvd., Palo Alto, CA 94306  650-325-8077
> > 
> 


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]