This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: C++ testsuite changes
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
- To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec dot gnu at mindspring dot com>
- Cc: gdb at sources dot redhat dot com, kettenis at chello dot nl
- Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2004 16:47:44 -0500
- Subject: Re: C++ testsuite changes
- References: <20040101214033.BD3764B35A@berman.michael-chastain.com>
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 04:40:33PM -0500, Michael Chastain wrote:
> On reflection, actually, I should keep the output identical for a
> rewrite. And I still have a bunch of nice "before" files.
> So I'll change classes.exp, derivation.exp, overload.exp, and
> virtfunc.exp so that they print the same results in the same order.
>
> Then I can fix the problems in the test script one problem at a time.
>
> I can reproduce Mark's problem with virtfunc.exp by using the
> sourceware version of TCL+Expect+Dejagnu rather than the released
> versions. In particular, the sourceware version of Expect was last
> updated in 1998. Argh! So I'll find some way to write virtfunc.exp
> that works with these versions of TCL+Expect+Dejagnu.
Can you identify what expect feature was causing the problem? I'm
quite curious.
I suspect we need to do an expect update...
> As far the virtual base pointer goes, if you consider it a bug in gdb,
> then I'll write a KFAIL arm for it and KFAIL it.
Thank you.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer