This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: GDB 5.3.91 available
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
- To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec at shout dot net>
- Cc: gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 22:42:39 -0400
- Subject: Re: GDB 5.3.91 available
- References: <200309030236.h832aZ2G032503@duracef.shout.net>
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 10:36:35PM -0400, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote:
> ac> GDB 5.3.91 (a pre-release of GDB 6.0) is available for download.
> ac> ftp://sources.redhat.com/pub/gdb/snapshots/branch/
> Just shoot me ...
> First gcc HEAD ICE's during in the bootstrap. When I go to
> date-search it, I find two different dates with two different ICE's.
> No idea when gcc HEAD will be available for testing again.
> So I back up to an old version of gcc HEAD, and my BuildGcc.pl coughs up:
> assembler not found: /berman/fsf/_today_/berman/install/target/native/binutils/HEAD/bin/as at /berman/home/mgnu/migbat/BuildGcc.pl line 128.
> That's funny, I wonder if I screwed up my scripts.
> [mgnu@berman _today_]$ ls /berman/fsf/_today_/berman/install/target/native/binutils/HEAD/bin/
> addr2line ld readelf
> ar nm size
> c++filt objcopy strings
> gprof objdump strip
> i686-pc-linux-gnu-as ranlib
> That ain't cool. It looks like binutils HEAD has a regression bug
> in the name handling for installing 'as'.
> Fortunately, regression-searching binutils is a lot easier than
> regression-searching gcc. In fact someone is likely to say 'aha'
> before I even get a proper bug write-up.
It's either my fault or my fault and the autoconf author's fault.
Please send me a config.log.
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer