This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GDB project.
- From: Smita <smita at cse dot ucsc dot edu>
- To: Kris Warkentin <kewarken at qnx dot com>
- Cc: Jason Molenda <jmolenda at apple dot com>, <gdb at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 18:26:48 -0800 (PST)
- Subject: gdb detach
I was wondering if there is a way to detach a process from gdb
from outside the gdb process? Or is there a way to find out the pid of
the gdb process that is controlling a process (i.e. when a process attched
Please forgive me if this the wrong group for this question.
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Kris Warkentin wrote:
> > Our developers use the future-breaks a lot here at Apple, they work
> > well for the sort of problem you're looking at.
> Thanks for responding Jason. I'm curious: are these patches in use at Apple
> not considered suitable for submission to the FSF? I'm just wondering why
> you maintain a separate tree rather than pushing everything out. We're
> trying hard to get all our changes rolled in to avoid the hassle of having a
> separate tree.