This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: gdb 5.3 versus gdb HEAD%200302015
- From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec at shout dot net>
- To: drow at mvista dot com, gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 10:32:30 -0600
- Subject: Re: gdb 5.3 versus gdb HEAD%200302015
drow> Ooh ooh. I got this one. The test is new in HEAD (wasn't in 5.3);
drow> it's a GCC bug; it will be fixed in 3.3, 3.4, and 3.2.3 if any. I
drow> checked the patch in the day after 3.2.2.
Beautiful, I'll just slip a URL to this message into my tracking
document. That takes care of the 5.4/6.0 angle.
My results are:
PASS for all stabs+
PASS for dwarf-2, gcc gcc-3_3-branch and gcc HEAD
FAIL for dwarf-2, gcc 2.95.3 and gcc 3.2-7-rh and gcc 3.2.2
Which matches your report.
I dropped coverage of gcc gcc-3_2-branch, but I might bring it back,
because I see that people are still checking into that branch.
The real question: is there a gcc PR for this. If there is a gcc PR,
then I can add an XFAIL arm to the test with the gcc PR number.