This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Register Groups (again)
- From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at ges dot redhat dot com>
- To: gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2002 19:48:22 -0400
- Subject: Register Groups (again)
See: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/2001-02/msg00268.html for the
origins of this idea.
I'd like to propose a new object ``struct reggroup'' and a number of
methods:
struct reggroup; // the opaque object
// Some predefined register groups
struct reggroup *general_reggroup;
struct reggroup *float_reggroup;
struct reggroup *system_reggroup;
struct reggroup *vector_reggroup;
struct reggroup *all_reggroup;
// architecture method indicating membership of a register group
int register_reggroup_p (gdbarch, regnum, reggroup);
// The reggroup's attributes
const char *reggroup_name (reggroup);
// Null terminated list of the architectures reggroups
struct reggroup **reggroups (gdbarch);
// Add a custom register group to an architecture
struct reggroup *reggroup_add (gdbarch, name, other attributes?);
A default register group function could look something like:
if all group
return 1
if float group and register's type is float
return 1;
if vector group and register's type is vector
return 1;
if general group and register's type isn't float or vector
return 1
return 0
And the ``info registers', ``info float'', ``info all-registers'' and
``info vector'' (``info system''?) commands would then use it.
The big gapeing holes in this proposal are:
- an MI/GUI interface.
The above interface provides:
for (regnum = 0; regnum < NUM_REGS+NUM_PSEUDO_REGS; regnum++)
if (register_reggroup_p (arch, regnum, XXXX_group)
....
I guess that would be abstracted somehow. Somebody elses problem though :-)
- how it relates to frames
It currently assumes that the register groups are identical between
frames :-/
comments, thoughts?
Andrew
PS: I guess this gets written up and goes into the ``Registers'' chapter.