This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Mine is for: do the same as for breakpoints (unless that is also dump-core :-)Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 15:21:24 -0700 From: Jason Molenda <jason-swarelist@molenda.com> Do either of these approaches appeal to anyone?My vote is for removing the watchpoint, but I think the message should be more clear. For example: if (! gdb_parse_exp_1 (&s, innermost_block, 0, &(b->exp))) { warning ("Unable to reset watchpoint %d (some of " "its variables don't exist); deleting", b->number);
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |