This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Testsuite status/proper configure?
- To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <chastain at cygnus dot com>
- Subject: Re: Testsuite status/proper configure?
- From: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>
- Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 19:48:01 +0200
- Cc: gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
- References: <200107081550.IAA30227@bosch.cygnus.com>
Michael Elizabeth Chastain <chastain@cygnus.com> writes:
> Your test process looks okay to me.
>
> These are similar to my test results. I run the test suite each weekend
> week and post the results to:
>
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-testers
Thanks. Now I have confidence to my results and will post them in the
proper way (with all needed info) next time. The number of FAILS
suprised me.
> Nitpick #1: dejagnu does not report the count of ERRORs and WARNINGs.
> I have to count these by hand:
>
> grep -c ERROR gdb.sum
> grep -c WARNING gdb.sum
> The triple "# ERRORs, # WARNINGs, # FAILs" is more useful than "# FAILs",
> because if something goes wrong, the results can have a lot of ERRORs
> and WARNINGs with fewer FAILs.
I'll add these next time.
> Nitpick #2: it helps to know which compiler you ran the test suite with.
> gdb should behave the same no matter what compiler that it's built
> with. But the debug info in the programs-under-test depends a lot on
> what compiler it's built with and the version of that compiler. In
> particular, there's a big difference between v2 gcc and v3 gcc.
> (I use a v3 gcc when I test).
I've used gcc 2.95.3.
> Basically your test process is good and those numbers are real.
Thanks for the confirmation,
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger
SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
private aj@arthur.inka.de
http://www.suse.de/~aj