This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Obsolete systems for GDB 5.1?
- To: GDB Discussion <gdb at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: Obsolete systems for GDB 5.1?
- From: Christopher Faylor <cgf at redhat dot com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 23:28:13 -0500
- References: <3A666F6F.90372D25@cygnus.com>
FWIW, I think that the removal of all of these makes sense.
cgf
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 03:22:07PM +1100, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>I'd like to table the following as candidates for removal from GDB.
>They would be marked as obsolete in GDB 5.1.
>
>
>The following systems were identified because they continue to use the
>*xdep.c* file.
>
>Rather than fix these platforms, I'd like to remove them. Eliminating
>*xdep.c from GDB should greatly simplify things like the move to
>automake (and more immediatly the long outstanding need to fix
>gdb/gdbserv's configury).
>
> m68030-sony-*) gdb_host=news1000 ;;
> m68*-isi-*) gdb_host=isi ;;
> m68*-sony-*) gdb_host=news ;;
> a29k-*-*) gdb_host=ultra3 ;;
> ns32k-umax-*) gdb_host=umax ;;
> mpw*-*-*) see mpw-config.in
>
>
>The following systems were identified because they they do not have a
>maintainer and are known to not build:
>
> i[3456]86-*-sunos*) gdb_host=sun386 ;; (This is *NOT* solaris-2)
> ns32k-umax-*) gdb_host=umax ;;
> Uses deleted function safe_strsignal().
>
>
>The following systems were identified because their target does not have
>a maintainer *AND* I was not able to build them (FreeBSD host). The
>file gdb/MAINTAINERS will contain up-to-date status on this and other
>targets.
>
> i960
> mcore
> mn10200
> ns32k
> ns32k-*-mach3*) gdb_host=ns32km3 ;;
> ns32k-*-netbsd*) gdb_host=nbsd ;;
> ns32k-umax-*) gdb_host=umax ;;
> ns32k-utek-sysv*) gdb_host=merlin ;;
> tic80
> v850
> w65
> z8k
>
>Comments. Suggestions and rejections.