This is the mail archive of the
gdb-testers@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Failures on Fedora-ppc64be-native-extended-gdbserver-m64, branch master
- From: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj at redhat dot com>
- To: gdb-testers at sourceware dot org
- Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 15:46:18 -0500
- Subject: Re: Failures on Fedora-ppc64be-native-extended-gdbserver-m64, branch master
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <E1YJG3L-0002Wg-HL at kwanyin dot sergiodj dot net>
On Thursday, February 05 2015, I wrote:
> Buildslave:
> fedora-21-ppc64be-2
>
> Full Build URL:
> <http://gdb-build.sergiodj.net/builders/Fedora-ppc64be-native-extended-gdbserver-m64/builds/78>
>
> Commit(s) tested:
> b9394193d08bef2193f805ded0af898e4c10a509
>
> Author(s) (in the same order as the commits):
> Don Breazeal <donb@codesourcery.com>
>
> Testsuite log (gdb.sum and gdb.log) URL(s):
> <http://gdb-build.sergiodj.net/cgit/Fedora-ppc64be-native-extended-gdbserver-m64/.git/tree/?h=master&id=b6fc05008fa0156ae1dc2678271d5d9bcaf04df7>
>
> *** Failed to update master GDB git repository. The build can continue. ***
>
> *** Regressions found ***
> ============================
> new FAIL: gdb.base/gdb-sigterm.exp: expect eof #10 (stepping inside range 201 times)
> new FAIL: gdb.base/gdb-sigterm.exp: expect eof #14 (stepping inside range 201 times)
> new FAIL: gdb.base/gdb-sigterm.exp: expect eof #15 (stepping inside range 201 times)
> new FAIL: gdb.base/gdb-sigterm.exp: expect eof #17 (stepping inside range 201 times)
> new FAIL: gdb.base/gdb-sigterm.exp: expect eof #2 (stepping inside range 201 times)
> new FAIL: gdb.base/gdb-sigterm.exp: expect eof #32 (stepping inside range 201 times)
> new FAIL: gdb.base/gdb-sigterm.exp: expect eof #39 (stepping inside range 201 times)
> new FAIL: gdb.base/gdb-sigterm.exp: expect eof #41 (stepping inside range 201 times)
> new FAIL: gdb.base/gdb-sigterm.exp: expect eof #6 (stepping inside range 201 times)
> PASS -> FAIL: gdb.threads/gcore-stale-thread.exp: exited thread is current due to non-stop
> PASS -> FAIL: gdb.threads/gcore-stale-thread.exp: save a corefile
> ============================
I'm thinking about including gdb-sigterm.exp in the "--ignore" list for
RUNTESTFLAGS. Opinions?
--
Sergio
GPG key ID: 0x65FC5E36
Please send encrypted e-mail if possible
http://sergiodj.net/