This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [Regression] [PATCH] Do not print empty-group regs when printing general ones
- From: Shahab Vahedi <Shahab dot Vahedi at synopsys dot com>
- To: Luis Machado <luis dot machado at linaro dot org>, Shahab Vahedi <shahab dot vahedi at gmail dot com>, Christian Biesinger <cbiesinger at google dot com>
- Cc: Shahab Vahedi <Shahab dot Vahedi at synopsys dot com>, "gdb-patches at sourceware dot org" <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>, Claudiu Zissulescu <Claudiu dot Zissulescu at synopsys dot com>, Francois Bedard <Francois dot Bedard at synopsys dot com>, Andrew Burgess <andrew dot burgess at embecosm dot com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2020 15:19:48 +0000
- Subject: Re: [Regression] [PATCH] Do not print empty-group regs when printing general ones
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=synopsys.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=synopsys.com; dkim=pass header.d=synopsys.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=1w+Xz0fL6AjHzDU6e1tK6HRkDkgSr9SfavHAANx0pu8=; b=lAGb6S0C7Y65ik6v9ipX/JsqIjoJI5y7oPHgdqKuZz1m/gPDwxtdZhgWIzUZ024GCT9InyAga9uCX69mEKWrG7JgB4W6oClKzS1D/Gt3AUZOdEUvtZJB3QGQZL8zbyHudEplLmJiQF4tnPLefNHGZvun534g3F96bD7Jb/Qi68rbCV6wwSnsJmoQhSvMRGFfJw0xcpUn+3dQIw4TjhN5LuxObAEPLT4nj6cAWjAhWzCLozcqH3u0OIkvGz2A+2EiUEKLXF2dB46TTB0CqecM7zY0O6qOGFpW8VGpQRq2zntFm/w8V7uWX1+e/FJiV4WFPJAjSJJ0aixZRw4ON9WmOw==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=agRqf/+xAEuInOf0C4AubqMoLEBikelDDMZgjea5uIv094AJt3mHfaAtgtbZx1GtKZiS6/Z5wiGaYavEZWzoyT9Tp1K0eKvLksMk457rQ8HIz5i/3OuUWr7NGQVtuLcB9SbXL9cqIkNrpkcgx/+Vg9yl9zmTY7nix/ZiGhjsybA/HCx/JiqqBej7Er38DaNHgbepghJJifeLQ3cWKRpiMbPK5x3ahNXA0rBfW925DFBDjqpj3gfWd4Jfz0XOksa5pmwJaFAKhZnusNfLukGsUI4I0qCMOJDLP9Z8XVZ88grqgBThCxRh5+OTKyzDtWDC0ij5DidyV/FCQqEL/YANjw==
- References: <20200120155315.30333-1-shahab.vahedi@gmail.com> <CH2PR12MB3847E492663E7997CFAB1741A6070@CH2PR12MB3847.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> <75f76108-a233-6fce-66a2-86452371e1be@linaro.org> <CAPTJ0XGEgr5RTMhcUZjrtr5pJXdMdgb-tO=mT_K0NjiO=pgwcw@mail.gmail.com> <9c256b27-4a00-8830-46e2-934922e39cc2@linaro.org> <20200228133618.GA3269@gmail.com> <51718427-72e2-ce12-7181-26ec9b38d947@linaro.org> <20200228140801.GB3269@gmail.com> <CAPTJ0XE7U5=WHPoje_0e3hJx26AFzaZ+JNDbcPtqtoHuxPqxFw@mail.gmail.com> <20200228141545.GC3269@gmail.com> <33535485-cd54-6817-6e09-7f9de835766e@linaro.org>
Hi Luis,
On 3/4/20 2:16 PM, Luis Machado wrote:
> Should we revert this for now then, and address this problem with an upcoming patch?
Since this breaks the backward compatibility, I agree. Thank you for looking into this.
Cheers,
--
Shahab