This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH] Link to -lssp when available (fixes mingw build)
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- To: Christian Biesinger <cbiesinger at google dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 20:44:47 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Link to -lssp when available (fixes mingw build)
- References: <20191218181413.128412-1-cbiesinger@google.com>
> Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 12:14:13 -0600
> From: "Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
> Cc: Christian Biesinger <cbiesinger@google.com>
>
> Recent mingw versions require -lssp when using _FORTIFY_SOURCE, which
> gdb does (in common-defs.h)
> https://github.com/msys2/MINGW-packages/issues/5868#issuecomment-544107564
>
> gdb/ChangeLog:
>
> 2019-12-18 Christian Biesinger <cbiesinger@google.com>
>
> * configure: Regenerate.
> * gdbsupport/common.m4: Look for -lssp to fix mingw.
This will produce a GDB binary that requires libssp-0.dll to be
present to run, won't it? And since libssp-0.dll is part of GCC,
this will have 2 annoying effects:
. we could be in "DLL hell" if there's an incompatibility between
libssp against which GDB was linkes and the one actually installed
on the system where we run GDB;
. if someone wants to distribute MinGW binaries of GDB, they will
have to distribute the GCC sources as well, since DLLs cannot
enjoy the libgcc-type exception
Is there a way to link against libssp.a statically? If so, it would
be better to do that. Failing that, I'd recommend not to define
_FORTIFY_SOURCE in MinGW builds, because the above annoyances IMO
outweigh its utility.
Thanks.