[review] Replace some more qsort calls with std::sort

["Tom Tromey (Code Review)" <gerrit at gnutoolchain-gerrit dot osci dot io>]

Tom Tromey has posted comments on this change.

Change URL: https://gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io/r/c/binutils-gdb/+/131
......................................................................


Patch Set 1:

(8 comments)

Thank you for the patch.  This is a nice improvement.

I found a few nits, but nothing serious.

https://gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io/r/c/binutils-gdb/+/131/1/gdb/breakpoint.c 
File gdb/breakpoint.c:

https://gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io/r/c/binutils-gdb/+/131/1/gdb/breakpoint.c@522 
PS1, Line 522: /* Array is sorted by bp_location_is_less_than - primarily by the ADDRESS.  */
In gerrit I can't tell if this line is overlong.
If it is, it should wrap.

It would be nice if we could add column guides to gerrit.


https://gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io/r/c/binutils-gdb/+/131/1/gdb/breakpoint.c@11440 
PS1, Line 11440:     return (a->address > b->address) < (a->address < b->address);
I think this can just be a->address < b->address ?


https://gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io/r/c/binutils-gdb/+/131/1/gdb/breakpoint.c@11448 
PS1, Line 11448: 	    < (a->pspace->num < b->pspace->num));
Likewise this can be simplified.

BTW gerrit doesn't seem to allow multi-line selections... bummer.


https://gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io/r/c/binutils-gdb/+/131/1/gdb/breakpoint.c@11452 
PS1, Line 11452:     return (a->permanent < b->permanent) < (a->permanent > b->permanent);
Ditto.


https://gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io/r/c/binutils-gdb/+/131/1/gdb/breakpoint.c@11460 
PS1, Line 11460: 	    < (a->owner->number < b->owner->number));
Ditto.


https://gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io/r/c/binutils-gdb/+/131/1/gdb/breakpoint.c@11462 
PS1, Line 11462:   return (a > b) < (a < b);
Even here.


https://gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io/r/c/binutils-gdb/+/131/1/gdb/disasm.c 
File gdb/disasm.c:

https://gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io/r/c/binutils-gdb/+/131/1/gdb/disasm.c@184 
PS1, Line 184:         val = mle1.start_pc - mle2.start_pc;
This code is a bit weird.  It only works because "val" has signed type,
as start_pc is unsigned.  I think it would be a lot clearer to just
change this to use plain < instead of subtraction.


https://gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io/r/c/binutils-gdb/+/131/1/gdb/mdebugread.c 
File gdb/mdebugread.c:

https://gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io/r/c/binutils-gdb/+/131/1/gdb/mdebugread.c@4570 
PS1, Line 4570:   addr_diff = (BLOCK_START (b1)) - (BLOCK_START (b2));
This has the same oddity involving signs.  I think just using the
obvious comparisons would be better.