This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH] Improve qsort_cmp performance by memoizing objfile data
>>>>> "Vijay" == Vijay Klein <vijaygk2@illinois.edu> writes:
Vijay> RATIONALE: The rationale behind this patch is that, currently, the
Vijay> qsort_cmp function can fall into a default case where it linearly
Vijay> traverses all the objfiles.
Thank you for the patch.
I'm curious if you have seen this code path taken.
Vijay> FSF Copyright Assignment: To be completely honest, I'm not entirely
Vijay> sure what is required here. I designed and wrote the entire change, if
Vijay> that is relevant. On the contribution checklist, it said the reviewer
Vijay> would send me the proper form, so all help is appreciated!
I don't think I have the forms available any more. Maybe one of the
other maintainers can email you the appropriate one; or you can email
assign@gnu for the paperwork.
Vijay> + int index;
...
Vijay> - section = &objfile->sections[gdb_bfd_section_index (abfd, asect)];
Vijay> + index = gdb_bfd_section_index (abfd, asect);
Better nowadays to just write "int index = ...".
Vijay> +/* Must be called whenever the order of the linked list is edited, to ensure
Vijay> + the comparison function has up to date info. Freeing an objfile does not
Vijay> + require this function, as the order is maintained, but a function like
Vijay> + `put_objfile_before` should certainly call this. */
Vijay> +void
Vijay> +update_objfile_ids (void)
It seems to me that there isn't a deep reason to prefer exactly the
order of the objfiles in the list -- any consistent order seems fine.
So, how about just setting the objfile's "id" at creation time, and
using that?
Then this function wouldn't be needed.
Vijay> + /* Memoized BFD section index returned from gdb_bfd_section_index */
Vijay> + int index;
GNU style is to have a period (followed by 2 spaces) at the end of
comment.
Vijay> + /* A unique sequence identifier for the global linked list */
Here too.
Tom