This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
[8.3 backport] Fix crash in cp_print_value_fields
- From: Tom de Vries <tdevries at suse dot de>
- To: Tom Tromey <tromey at adacore dot com>, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Cc: Tom Tromey <tom at tromey dot com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2019 17:14:50 +0200
- Subject: [8.3 backport] Fix crash in cp_print_value_fields
- References: <20190517201814.27951-1-tromey@adacore.com>
On 17-05-19 22:18, Tom Tromey wrote:
> From: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
>
> PR c++/20020 concerns a crash in cp_print_value_fields. The immediate
> cause is that cp_print_value_fields does not handle the case where
> value_static_field fails. This is fixed in this patch by calling
> cp_print_static_field from the "try" block.
>
> Digging a bit deeper, the error occurs because GCC does not emit a
> DW_AT_const_value for a static constexpr member appearing in a
> template class. I've filed a GCC bug for this.
>
> Tested on x86-64 Fedora 29.
>
> gdb/ChangeLog
> 2019-05-17 Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
>
> PR c++/20020:
> * cp-valprint.c (cp_print_value_fields): Call
> cp_print_static_field inside "try".
>
> gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
> 2019-05-17 Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
>
> PR c++/20020:
> * gdb.cp/constexpr-field.exp: New file.
> * gdb.cp/constexpr-field.cc: New file.
OK to backport to 8.3, as well as the followup patch "Fix two buglets in
cp_print_value_fields patch"?
Neither of the patches apply cleanly, so I'm attaching them here.
The difference in test results is:
...
+Running gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/constexpr-field.exp ...
+XFAIL: gdb.cp/constexpr-field.exp: print x (PRMS gcc/90526)
+PASS: gdb.cp/constexpr-field.exp: print y
...
Thanks,
- Tom
Fix crash in cp_print_value_fields
[ Backport of master commit 4330d61dfb. ]
PR c++/20020 concerns a crash in cp_print_value_fields. The immediate
cause is that cp_print_value_fields does not handle the case where
value_static_field fails. This is fixed in this patch by calling
cp_print_static_field from the "try" block.
Digging a bit deeper, the error occurs because GCC does not emit a
DW_AT_const_value for a static constexpr member appearing in a
template class. I've filed a GCC bug for this.
Tested on x86-64 Fedora 29.
gdb/ChangeLog
2019-05-29 Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
PR c++/20020:
* cp-valprint.c (cp_print_value_fields): Call
cp_print_static_field inside "try".
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
2019-05-29 Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
PR c++/20020:
* gdb.cp/constexpr-field.exp: New file.
* gdb.cp/constexpr-field.cc: New file.
---
gdb/ChangeLog | 6 ++++++
gdb/cp-valprint.c | 13 +++++------
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog | 6 ++++++
gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/constexpr-field.cc | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/constexpr-field.exp | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
5 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdb/ChangeLog b/gdb/ChangeLog
index ee958c3f6e..f15cc5fcf0 100644
--- a/gdb/ChangeLog
+++ b/gdb/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+2019-05-29 Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
+
+ PR c++/20020:
+ * cp-valprint.c (cp_print_value_fields): Call
+ cp_print_static_field inside "try".
+
2019-06-10 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
PR symtab/24545
diff --git a/gdb/cp-valprint.c b/gdb/cp-valprint.c
index 7124da42ec..8feaae03aa 100644
--- a/gdb/cp-valprint.c
+++ b/gdb/cp-valprint.c
@@ -314,13 +314,14 @@ cp_print_value_fields (struct type *type, struct type *real_type,
}
else if (field_is_static (&TYPE_FIELD (type, i)))
{
- struct value *v = NULL;
-
TRY
{
- v = value_static_field (type, i);
- }
+ struct value *v = value_static_field (type, i);
+ cp_print_static_field (TYPE_FIELD_TYPE (type, i),
+ v, stream, recurse + 1,
+ options);
+ }
CATCH (ex, RETURN_MASK_ERROR)
{
fprintf_filtered (stream,
@@ -328,10 +329,6 @@ cp_print_value_fields (struct type *type, struct type *real_type,
ex.message);
}
END_CATCH
-
- cp_print_static_field (TYPE_FIELD_TYPE (type, i),
- v, stream, recurse + 1,
- options);
}
else if (i == vptr_fieldno && type == vptr_basetype)
{
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
index ea1f78cc4b..5f26daa67e 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+2019-05-29 Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
+
+ PR c++/20020:
+ * gdb.cp/constexpr-field.exp: New file.
+ * gdb.cp/constexpr-field.cc: New file.
+
2019-04-30 Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
PR c++/24470:
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/constexpr-field.cc b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/constexpr-field.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..ac2e514cb3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/constexpr-field.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+/* This testcase is part of GDB, the GNU debugger.
+
+ Copyright 2019 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+
+ This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+ the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
+ (at your option) any later version.
+
+ This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+ GNU General Public License for more details.
+
+ You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+ along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */
+
+template<typename T>
+struct X
+{
+ static constexpr bool f = true;
+};
+
+X<int> x;
+
+struct Y
+{
+ static constexpr bool f = true;
+};
+
+Y y;
+
+int
+main (void)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/constexpr-field.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/constexpr-field.exp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..e4849efeae
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/constexpr-field.exp
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+# Copyright 2019 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+#
+# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+# the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
+# (at your option) any later version.
+#
+# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+# GNU General Public License for more details.
+#
+# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+# along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
+
+# This file is part of the gdb testsuite.
+
+if {[skip_cplus_tests]} { continue }
+
+standard_testfile .cc
+
+if {[prepare_for_testing "failed to prepare" $testfile $srcfile \
+ {c++ debug additional_flags=-std=c++17}]} {
+ return -1
+}
+
+if {![runto_main]} {
+ perror "couldn't run to breakpoint"
+ continue
+}
+
+# "x" sometimes isn't available due to
+# https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90526
+gdb_test "print x" " = {static f = .*}"
+
+gdb_test "print y" " = {static f = true}"
Fix buglet in cp_print_value_fields patch
[ Backport of master commit 3d507ff23b. ]
Pedro pointed out an issue in the cp_print_value_fields
patch, aka the fix for PR c++/20020.
This patch addresses the issue. Tested on x86-64 Fedora 29.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
2019-06-27 Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
* gdb.cp/constexpr-field.exp: Use setup_xfail.
---
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog | 4 ++++
gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/constexpr-field.exp | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
index 5f26daa67e..c51036165c 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2019-06-27 Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
+
+ * gdb.cp/constexpr-field.exp: Use setup_xfail.
+
2019-05-29 Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
PR c++/20020:
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/constexpr-field.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/constexpr-field.exp
index e4849efeae..2f71cef952 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/constexpr-field.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/constexpr-field.exp
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ if {![runto_main]} {
# "x" sometimes isn't available due to
# https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90526
-gdb_test "print x" " = {static f = .*}"
+setup_xfail *-*-* gcc/90526
+gdb_test "print x" " = {static f = true}"
gdb_test "print y" " = {static f = true}"