This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[PATCH 3/3] gdb: Show type summary for anonymous structures from c_print_typedef

Currently each language has a la_print_typedef method, this is only
used for the "info types" command.

The documentation for "info types" says:

   Print a brief description of all types whose names match the regular
   expression @var{regexp} (or all types in your program, if you supply
   no argument).

However, if we consider this C code:

   typedef struct {
     int a;
   } my_type;

Then currently with "info types" this will be printed like this:

   3:      typedef struct {
       int a;
   } my_type;

I see two problems with this, first the indentation is clearly broken,
second, if the struct contained more fields then the it feels like the
actual type names could easily get lost in the noise.

Given that "info types" is about discovering type names, I think there
is an argument to be made that we should focus on giving _only_ the
briefest summary for "info types", and if the user wants to know more
they can take the type name and plug it into "ptype".  As such, I
propose that a better output would be:

   3:      typedef struct {...} my_type;

The user understands that there is a type called `my_type`, and that
it's an alias for an anonymous structure type.

The change to achieve this turns out to be pretty simple, but only
effects languages that make use of c_print_typedef, which are C, C++,
asm, minimal, d, go, objc, and opencl.  Other languages will for now
do whatever they used to do.

I did look at ada, as this is the only language to actually have some
tests for "info types", however, as I understand it ada doesn't really
support typedefs, however, by forcing the language we can see what ada
would print.  So, if we 'set language ada', then originally we printed

   3:      record
       a: int;
   end record

Again the indentation is clearly broken, but we also have no mention
of the type name at all, which is odd, but understandable given the
lack of typedefs.  If I make a similar change as I'm proposing for C,
then we now get this output:

   3:      record ... end record

Which is even less informative I think.  However, the original output
_is_ tested for in gdb.ada/info_auto_lang.exp, and its not clear to me
if the change is a good one or not, so for now I have left this out.


	* c-typeprint.c (c_print_typedef): Pass -1 instead of 0 to


	* gdb.ada/info_auto_lang.exp: Update expected results.
	* gdb.base/info-types.c: Add anonymous struct typedef.
	* gdb.base/info-types.exp: Update expected results.
 gdb/ChangeLog                            |  5 +++++
 gdb/c-typeprint.c                        |  2 +-
 gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog                  |  6 ++++++
 gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/info_auto_lang.exp |  5 +----
 gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/info-types.c      | 10 ++++++++++
 gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/info-types.exp    |  2 ++
 6 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gdb/c-typeprint.c b/gdb/c-typeprint.c
index 6690ca53bcd..43ad3b3e0e6 100644
--- a/gdb/c-typeprint.c
+++ b/gdb/c-typeprint.c
@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ c_print_typedef (struct type *type,
   type = check_typedef (type);
   fprintf_filtered (stream, "typedef ");
-  type_print (type, "", stream, 0);
+  type_print (type, "", stream, -1);
   if (TYPE_NAME ((SYMBOL_TYPE (new_symbol))) == 0
       || strcmp (TYPE_NAME ((SYMBOL_TYPE (new_symbol))),
 		 SYMBOL_LINKAGE_NAME (new_symbol)) != 0
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/info_auto_lang.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/info_auto_lang.exp
index be1deae99ef..68457827d2f 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/info_auto_lang.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/info_auto_lang.exp
@@ -53,10 +53,7 @@ set func_in_c(ada_syntax)    "${decimal}:	procedure proc_in_c;"
 set func_in_ada(c_syntax)    "${decimal}:	void proc_in_ada\\\(void\\\);"
 set func_in_ada(ada_syntax)  "${decimal}:	procedure proc_in_ada;"
-set type_in_c(c_syntax) [multi_line \
-			    "${decimal}:	typedef struct {" \
-			    "    int some_component_in_c;" \
-			    "} some_type_in_c;" ]
+set type_in_c(c_syntax) "${decimal}:	typedef struct {\\.\\.\\.} some_type_in_c;"
 set type_in_c(ada_syntax) [multi_line \
 			      "${decimal}:	record" \
 			      "    some_component_in_c: int;" \
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/info-types.c b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/info-types.c
index d07866544b6..94d1f6c9938 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/info-types.c
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/info-types.c
@@ -38,6 +38,14 @@ enum enum_t
 typedef enum enum_t my_enum_t;
 typedef my_enum_t nested_enum_t;
+typedef struct
+  double d;
+  float f;
+} anon_struct_t;
+typedef anon_struct_t nested_anon_struct_t;
 volatile int var_a;
 volatile float var_b;
 volatile my_int_t var_c;
@@ -53,6 +61,8 @@ volatile baz_ptr var_l;
 volatile enum enum_t var_m;
 volatile my_enum_t var_n;
 volatile nested_enum_t var_o;
+volatile anon_struct_t var_p;
+volatile nested_anon_struct_t var_q;
 main ()
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/info-types.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/info-types.exp
index 2ebd76f0e94..781f8988f13 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/info-types.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/info-types.exp
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ gdb_test "info types" \
 	 "All defined types:" \
 	 "" \
 	 "File .*:" \
+	 "45:\[\t \]+typedef struct {\\.\\.\\.} anon_struct_t;" \
 	 "28:\[\t \]+typedef struct baz_t baz;" \
 	 "31:\[\t \]+typedef struct baz_t \\* baz_ptr;" \
 	 "21:\[\t \]+struct baz_t;" \
@@ -42,6 +43,7 @@ gdb_test "info types" \
 	 "38:\[\t \]+typedef enum enum_t my_enum_t;" \
 	 "17:\[\t \]+typedef float my_float_t;" \
 	 "16:\[\t \]+typedef int my_int_t;" \
+	 "47:\[\t \]+typedef struct {\\.\\.\\.} nested_anon_struct_t;" \
 	 "30:\[\t \]+typedef struct baz_t nested_baz;" \
 	 "29:\[\t \]+typedef struct baz_t nested_baz_t;" \
 	 "39:\[\t \]+typedef enum enum_t nested_enum_t;" \

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]