This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Introduce the "with" command
On Wed, 2019-06-19 at 14:05 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
> I'm thinking that the errors talking about "set" instead of
> "with" can be seen as a feature. If you consider the prefixed
> case, like "with print foo", the error is telling you where
> to look at the available settings for that prefix.
Yes, I think this is a good approach, and the error messages
are very clear.