This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] doc: fix false claim about second argument to gdb


On 2019-06-18 12:14 p.m., Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> From: Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca>
>> Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 10:51:03 -0400
>>
>> -You can, instead, specify a process ID as a second argument, if you want
>> -to debug a running process:
>> +You can, instead, specify a process ID as a second argument or using option
>> +@code{-p}, if you want to debug a running process:
> 
> "specify ... or using ..." is incorrect English.  I guess you meant
> "use"?

Oh, that's right.  Changed it to "use".

> No other comments, thanks.  (I didn't look at the code to see if the
> description is factually correct.)

I didn't check the code either, but tried various combinations and observed this behavior.

I pushed the patch with the error above fixed, thanks.

Simon


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]