This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Define gdb.Value(val, type) constructor
- From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb at redhat dot com>
- To: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 10:35:03 -0700
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Define gdb.Value(val, type) constructor
- References: <20190219143356.1576e67f@f29-4.lan>
I've pushed this series.
Kevin
On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 14:33:56 -0700
Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com> wrote:
> This four part patch series defines a two argument constructor for
> gdb.Value.
>
> gdb.Value currently has a one argument constructor. It takes a python
> value, figures out some potentially suitable gdb type and then
> constructs a gdb value of that type.
>
> The two argument version that I'm introducing is useful for
> constructing a gdb value of a specified type from a buffer of bytes.
> It takes the form gdb.Value (val, type). VAL is a python buffer object,
> i.e. an object from which bytes may be read using python's buffer
> protocol. TYPE is a gdb type perhaps obtained by calling
> gdb.lookup_type().
>
> Changes between the original series and this v2 series are as follows:
>
> Patch #1: No changes.
>
> Patch #2:
>
> Fix wording of comment noted by Simon.
>
> Change PyExc_RuntimeError to PyExc_TypeError for "type argument must
> be a gdb.Type" error. I found this while adding the additional test
> that Simon suggested.
>
> Patch #3:
>
> Add test which invokes gdb.Value where second argument is not
> a gdb.Type. (Suggested by Simon.)
>
> Patch #4:
>
> Add NEWS entry. (Requested by Eli.)
>
> Made other python.texi changes requested by Eli.
>
> Added missing "@end defun".