This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH 1/2] Look for separate debug files in debug directories under a sysroot.
On 2019-01-22 20:03, John Baldwin wrote:
When an object file is present in a system root, GDB currently looks
for separate debug files under the global debugfile directories. For
example, if the sysroot is set to "/myroot" and hte global debugfile
directory is set to "/usr/lib/debug", GDB will look for a separate
debug file for "/myroot/lib/libc.so.7" in the following paths:
/myroot/lib/libc.so.7.debug
/myroot/lib/.debug/libc.so.7.debug
/usr/lib/debug//myroot/lib/libc.so.7.debug
/usr/lib/debug/lib/libc.so.7.debug
However, some system roots include a full system installation
including a nested global debugfile directory under the sysroot. This
patch adds an additional check to support such systems. In the
example above the additional path searched is:
/myroot/usr/lib/debug/lib/libc.so.7.debug
To try to preserve existing behavior as much as possible, this new
path is searched last for each global debugfile directory.
I played with this a bit using a Raspbian sysroot. I think the behavior
you propose makes sense, perhaps more than the current behavior (I would
be curious to see a real-word case for that one). But anyway, keeping
the old behavior and adding a new one is fine. It's rather cheap to
check many possible locations, and since there's a crc check, there's
very little chance of loading a wrong separate debug file.
As discussed on IRC, we should probably add the same behavior for
build-id-based separate debug files.
diff --git a/gdb/symfile.c b/gdb/symfile.c
index 7f800add8c..c6d2c7c537 100644
--- a/gdb/symfile.c
+++ b/gdb/symfile.c
@@ -1465,6 +1465,25 @@ find_separate_debug_file (const char *dir,
if (separate_debug_file_exists (debugfile, crc32, objfile))
return debugfile;
}
+
+ /* If the file is in the sysroot, try using its base path in the
+ sysroot's global debugfile directory. */
+ if (canon_dir != NULL
+ && filename_ncmp (canon_dir, gdb_sysroot,
+ strlen (gdb_sysroot)) == 0
+ && IS_DIR_SEPARATOR (canon_dir[strlen (gdb_sysroot)]))
+ {
Is there any reason to duplicate the if above? It looks to be the same
as the previous check, so the new code could go in the existing if.
+ debugfile = target_prefix ? "target:" : "";
+ debugfile += gdb_sysroot;
+ debugfile += debugdir.get ();
+ debugfile += (canon_dir + strlen (gdb_sysroot));
+ debugfile += "/";
+ debugfile += debuglink;
+
+ if (separate_debug_file_exists (debugfile, crc32, objfile))
+ return debugfile;
+ }
+
Simon