Re: [PATCH] Fix MI output for multi-location breakpoints

[Simon Marchi <simon dot marchi at polymtl dot ca>]

On 2019-01-13 11:49, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > Which is the third place?  I thought we have it only in two places.
> > > The detailed table could come instead of that second place we have
> > > now, not in addition to it.  But let's wait with that decision until
> > > we actually see the proposed change for that table.
> >
> > 1. In "@node Mode Options"
> > 2. In "@node Interpreters"
> > 3. In the hypothetical table of MI versions.
>
> We don't need to consider hypothetical issues.  When it becomes real,
> we can discuss whether it will replace what's currently in
> "Interpreters" or be an addition.

I have sent a patch for this:

https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2019-01/msg00335.html

Simon