This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[RFAv2 2/4] Fix gdb.ada/rename_subscript_param.exp by using more unique names.


The test fails due to conflict between boolean 'b'and some 'b' in atnat.h:

(gdb) print b
Multiple matches for b
[0] cancel
[1] b at ../sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64/atnat.h:106
[2] b at ../sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64/atnat.h:106
[3] b at ../sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64/atnat.h:106
> FAIL: gdb.ada/rename_subscript_param.exp: print b before changing its value (timeout)

Fix by renaming 'b' to 'rename_subscript_param_b.
Also, change 'before' to 'after' in the gdb_test message that prints
the value after changing it.
The test however still fails for me, probably because the Debian stable
Ada compiler is too old, and does not properly generate debug info for
this renamining:
(gdb) print rename_subscript_param_b
No definition of "rename_subscript_param_b" in current context.
(gdb) FAIL: gdb.ada/rename_subscript_param.exp: print rename_subscript_param_b before changing its value

Note: if the compiler would generate the correct debug info, the test should
succeed with the name B.  However, waiting for this fix, changing the name
ensures that the test fails directly, instead of causing a timeout.

2018-12-26  Philippe Waroquiers  <philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be>

	* gdb.ada/rename_subscript_param/pkg.adb (B): Rename to
	Rename_Subscript_Param_B.  All users updated.
---
 gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/rename_subscript_param.exp     | 8 ++++----
 gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/rename_subscript_param/pkg.adb | 4 ++--
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/rename_subscript_param.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/rename_subscript_param.exp
index 9188bf0fa5..79370cfca2 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/rename_subscript_param.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/rename_subscript_param.exp
@@ -26,9 +26,9 @@ clean_restart ${testfile}
 set bp_location [gdb_get_line_number "BREAK" ${testdir}/pkg.adb]
 runto "pkg.adb:$bp_location"
 
-gdb_test "print b" \
+gdb_test "print rename_subscript_param_b" \
          " = false" \
-         "print b before changing its value"
+         "print rename_subscript_param_b before changing its value"
 
 set bp_location [gdb_get_line_number "Do_Nothing" ${testdir}/pkg.adb]
 gdb_test "break pkg.adb:$bp_location" \
@@ -39,6 +39,6 @@ gdb_test "cont" \
          "Breakpoint \[0-9\]+, pkg.flip \\(.*" \
          "Continuing to breakpoint on call to Do_Nothing"
 
-gdb_test "print b" \
+gdb_test "print rename_subscript_param_b" \
          " = true" \
-         "print b before changing its value"
+         "print rename_subscript_param_b after changing its value"
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/rename_subscript_param/pkg.adb b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/rename_subscript_param/pkg.adb
index cdbcd36ea5..c03fe16ad8 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/rename_subscript_param/pkg.adb
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/rename_subscript_param/pkg.adb
@@ -21,9 +21,9 @@ package body Pkg is
       --  Create a new scope to check that the scope match algorithm is fine in
       --  the front-end.
       declare
-         B : Boolean renames Bits (I);
+         Rename_Subscript_Param_B : Boolean renames Bits (I);
       begin
-         B := not B; -- BREAK
+         Rename_Subscript_Param_B := not Rename_Subscript_Param_B; -- BREAK
          Do_Nothing (Bits'Address);
       end;
    end Flip;
-- 
2.19.2


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]