* Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca> [2018-11-27 14:47:31 -0500]:
On 2018-11-27 06:21, Andrew Burgess wrote:
> Not as far as I can tell. I left it in just in case, but as far as I
> can tell there's no way to "install" CGEN. I'd be happy to drop the
> ../lib/cgen references (the else block) completely, and then validate
> that we have a CGEN source tree or error.... But the above seemed like
> the least invasive change.
From what I understand from you description, there's no way it could
have
been useful... but again, it's not hard to leave it there just to be
safe.
It's not my decision anyway :).
Right now I more worried that the only SIM maintained hasn't been seen
on either the GDB list or the binutils list in months, and despite
being included on the to/cc list, hasn't followed up on this mail.
Still, it's not been a month yet, so I'm sure it will all work itself
out :)
By the way, maybe this should still be sent to binutils for the
opcodes
part?
I originally posted to the binutils list, and had the opcodes part
approved. They pointed out that the sim/ part needed to be posted
here.