This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] testsuite: fix is_amd64_regs_target

From: Tom Tromey <tom at tromey dot com>
To: "Metzger\, Markus T" <markus dot t dot metzger at intel dot com>
Cc: Tom Tromey <tom at tromey dot com>, "gdb-patches\@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 11:20:53 -0600
Subject: Re: [PATCH] testsuite: fix is_amd64_regs_target
References: <1538034149-12136-1-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com> <1538034149-12136-2-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com> <8736tuodf9.fsf@tromey.com> <A78C989F6D9628469189715575E55B236B35EAD0@IRSMSX104.ger.corp.intel.com>

>>>>> "Markus" == Metzger, Markus T <markus.t.metzger@intel.com> writes:

Markus> That's my assumption, as well.  We already checked the architecture so we know it
Markus> is some x86 flavor.  A single 64-bit register should suffice.

I didn't see it go in, so I wanted to reiterate that I think it is ok.

Tom

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] testsuite: fix is_amd64_regs_target
  - From: Simon Marchi

References:
- [PATCH] btrace: check for indirect jump return in _Unwind_RaiseException
  - From: Markus Metzger
- [PATCH] testsuite: fix is_amd64_regs_target
  - From: Markus Metzger
- Re: [PATCH] testsuite: fix is_amd64_regs_target
  - From: Tom Tromey
- RE: [PATCH] testsuite: fix is_amd64_regs_target
  - From: Metzger, Markus T

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]