This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] gdb: Prefer RISC-V register name "s0" over "fp"

From: Jim Wilson <jimw at sifive dot com>
To: Andrew Burgess <andrew dot burgess at embecosm dot com>
Cc: Sebastian Huber <sebastian dot huber at embedded-brains dot de>, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 09:47:40 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdb: Prefer RISC-V register name "s0" over "fp"
References: <20180629085731.8439-1-sebastian.huber@embedded-brains.de> <20180629120807.GG15881@embecosm.com>

On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 5:08 AM, Andrew Burgess
<andrew.burgess@embecosm.com> wrote:
> This is fine with me based on GCC no generating $fp relative code by
> default.  However, I think we need to get binutils fixed too, $fp _is_
> a valid register name.

I can fix the assembler.

Jim

References:
- [PATCH] gdb: Prefer RISC-V register name "s0" over "fp"
  - From: Sebastian Huber
- Re: [PATCH] gdb: Prefer RISC-V register name "s0" over "fp"
  - From: Andrew Burgess

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]