This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [BuildBot] Notifications disabled for Debian-s390x-* and Fedora-ppc64*-* builders
- From: Yao Qi <qiyaoltc at gmail dot com>
- To: David Edelsohn <dje dot gcc at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj at redhat dot com>, GDB Patches <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>, Edjunior Machado <emachado at redhat dot com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 21:19:33 +0000
- Subject: Re: [BuildBot] Notifications disabled for Debian-s390x-* and Fedora-ppc64*-* builders
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <87d13g6r5t.fsf@redhat.com> <CAGWvny=7UX1tOm+jQGhN2Pd=MsctxmRsFkg0Jj-6RUvBNfxvjg@mail.gmail.com> <878te46pk4.fsf@redhat.com> <CAGWvnynhBRuC1=r=PQxCuP1fwB6-eUVONAtLX2cGgAZJ8L9G_g@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 2:34 PM, David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> But the irony in your message should not be ignored. You implicitly
> express that the buildbots are ignored, except possibly x86 and Try
> Builds on x86, while you proceed to ask for additional participation.
How do you get such implicit message? That is your bias. We still have
aarch64 and aarch32 buildslaves, they are quite stable, and catches
some build failures with g++ 4.8 and regressions.
These builders are disabled because they are useless. Sergio asks for
participation to make these builders useful. If no one wants to make these
builders better, or cares about them, it is reasonable to disable them. It
is equivalent to code/feature/port deprecation, if nobody maintains the
code/feature/port, we'll deprecate it.
> This is fundamentally inconsistent. Actions speak louder than words
> and this demonstrates the priorities of the GDB community.
I don't see the inconsistency here. We need more participation or contribution
to make these builders more useful, it is simple, isn't?
--
Yao (齐尧)