This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Regression on i686 host: gdb.base/floatn.exp: [RFC v2][2/2] Target FP: Make use of MPFR if available


Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Dec 2017 16:09:56 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> > Hi Ulrich,
> > 
> > 2400729ecfd2c7be8b18aeaa822fef5a4b503f8a is the first bad commit
> > commit 2400729ecfd2c7be8b18aeaa822fef5a4b503f8a
> > Author: Ulrich Weigand <ulrich.weigand@de.ibm.com>
> > Date:   Wed Nov 22 13:53:43 2017 +0100
> >     Target FP: Make use of MPFR if available
> > 
> > FAIL: gdb.base/floatn.exp: the original value of f128 is 3.375
> > FAIL: gdb.base/floatn.exp: try to change f128 to -3.375 with 'print f128=-3.375'
> > FAIL: gdb.base/floatn.exp: the value of f128 is changed to 30.375
> > FAIL: gdb.base/floatn.exp: the original value of c128 is 3.375 + 1 * I
> 
> I have seen now also there, that will be probably the same, I did not check
> more:
> 	-PASS: gdb.base/float128.exp: try to change f128 to -2.375 with 'print f128=-2.375l'
> 	+FAIL: gdb.base/float128.exp: try to change f128 to -2.375 with 'print f128=-2.375l'
> 	-PASS: gdb.base/float128.exp: the value of f128 is changed to 20.375
> 	+FAIL: gdb.base/float128.exp: the value of f128 is changed to 20.375
> 	+FAIL: gdb.base/float128.exp: print large128

Hi Jan,

I was able to reproduce this problem by building GDB itself as a 32-bit binary.

I'm currently testing a fix ...

Bye,
Ulrich

-- 
  Dr. Ulrich Weigand
  GNU/Linux compilers and toolchain
  Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]