Re: [PATCH 1/4] Basic c++ification of varobj

[Simon Marchi <simon dot marchi at polymtl dot ca>]

On 2017-11-21 16:30, Yao Qi wrote:
> On 17-11-18 16:46:03, Simon Marchi wrote:
> >    /* If 1, the -var-update always recomputes the value in the
> >       current thread and frame.  Otherwise, variable object is
> >       always updated in the specific scope/thread/frame.  */
> > -  int floating;
> > +  int floating = 0;
> >
> >    /* Flag that indicates validity: set to 0 when this varobj_root 
> > refers
> >       to symbols that do not exist anymore.  */
> > -  int is_valid;
> > +  int is_valid = 1;
>
> Since we do the change, can we change these fields to bool?

To keep patches simple, I'll do that in another patch on top of that 
series.  There are more places we can change variables to bool, so I'll 
make a pass on the whole varobj.c/h.

> > @@ -114,27 +113,27 @@ struct varobj_dynamic
> >       used to decide if dynamic varobj should recompute their 
> > children.
> >       In the event that the frontend never asked for the children, we
> >       can avoid that.  */
> > -  int children_requested;
> > +  int children_requested = 0;
>
> Likewise.  Otherwise, it is good to me.

Thanks!

Simon