This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH] FT32: support for FT32B processor - part 1
- From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb at redhat dot com>
- To: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Cc: Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>
- Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2017 10:01:21 -0700
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] FT32: support for FT32B processor - part 1
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- Authentication-results: ext-mx05.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com
- Authentication-results: ext-mx05.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=kevinb at redhat dot com
- Dmarc-filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 9B48337EEF
- References: <2BB0A51F073B384698CACFD1D5A30FCC0DED1F49@glaexch1>
On Wed, 4 Oct 2017 16:51:02 +0000
James Bowman <james.bowman@ftdichip.com> wrote:
> FT32B is a new FT32 family member. It has a code
> compression scheme, which requires the use of linker
> relaxations. The change is quite large, so submission
> is in several parts.
>
> Part 1 adds a 15-bit instruction field, and CPU-specific functions for
> the code compression that are used in binutils and GDB.
>
> This patch contains the gdb changes. The corresponding binutils patch is
> https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2017-10/msg00010.html
>
> OK to commit?
Hi James,
I've looked over your patch. While I have not researched the specifics
of the FT32B, your patch looks reasonable to me.
I would approve this patch if I could, but after looking at
sim/MAINTAINERS it seems that only Mike Frysinger may approve this
patch.
Kevin