This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Obsolete/remove Solaris < 10 [was: Re: Fix gdb 8.1 Solaris compilation]
- From: Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>
- To: Rainer Orth <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE>, Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 15:39:50 +0100
- Subject: Re: Obsolete/remove Solaris < 10 [was: Re: Fix gdb 8.1 Solaris compilation]
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- Authentication-results: ext-mx10.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com
- Authentication-results: ext-mx10.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=palves at redhat dot com
- Dmarc-filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 5C43BA0366
- References: <yddy3p8p5l6.fsf@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> <mvm8th819a0.fsf@suse.de> <yddtvzwp293.fsf@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> <yddk20sp1i5.fsf_-_@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
On 09/21/2017 03:30 PM, Rainer Orth wrote:
> This bad interaction between gnulib and fixed Solaris 9 headers may be
> fixable, but even trying to seems like a total waste of time.
>
> How is obsoletion/removal handled in gdb? In gcc, in one release a
> target is obsoleted and trying to build it yields an error which can be
> overridden with --enable-obsolete. Unless someone steps up to continue
> maintenance, the code is removed in the next release.
GDB is more aggressive:
https://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/Internals%20Obsoleting-code
For Solaris, I believe it's been a while that the only maintenance
we've seen comes from you. Which kind of makes you the de-facto
maintainer. :-) Since gcc obsoleted Solaris 9 years ago, and nobody
all these years stepped forward, I think we should be able to just drop
it. I think you've proposed this in the past, even. I very
much doubt anyone would step forward this time.
> Does gdb go for immediate removal instead? I have no idea which release
> last built/worked on Solaris 9. I have a build of 7.11 lying around,
> but never tried anything later.
Thanks,
Pedro Alves