This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH] Simplify regcache_cpy and remove regcache::cpy_no_passthrough
- From: Alan Hayward <Alan dot Hayward at arm dot com>
- To: Yao Qi <qiyaoltc at gmail dot com>
- Cc: "gdb-patches at sourceware dot org" <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>, nd <nd at arm dot com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 09:01:14 +0000
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Simplify regcache_cpy and remove regcache::cpy_no_passthrough
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- Authentication-results: gmail.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;gmail.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=arm.com;
- Nodisclaimer: True
- References: <1498549057-3942-1-git-send-email-yao.qi@linaro.org> <CCE54772-81EB-4A70-A990-ACE3BF29A767@arm.com> <86k237s3hl.fsf@gmail.com>
- Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
- Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
> On 17 Jul 2017, at 12:32, Yao Qi <qiyaoltc@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Alan Hayward <Alan.Hayward@arm.com> writes:
>
>> If not, then there should be a comment above regcache_cpy stating the
>> restrictions.
>
> I updated the comments to regcache_dup and regcache_cpy.
Ok for me.
>
> --
> Yao (齐尧)
> From 4ff91e90cad73f9420f8ca37fc7e22f465ebcb88 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Yao Qi <yao.qi@linaro.org>
> Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 22:45:12 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] Simplify regcache_cpy and remove regcache::cpy_no_passthrough
>
> Nowadays, regcache_cpy is used where src is read-only and dst is not
> read-only, so the regcache_cpy can be simplified to handle this case only.
> As a result, regcache::cpy_no_passthrough, which is about two read-only
> regcache copy, is no longer used, remove it as well.
>
> gdb:
>
> 2017-07-17 Yao Qi <yao.qi@linaro.org>
>
> * regcache.c (regcache_cpy): Simplify it.
> (regcache::cpy_no_passthrough): Remove it.
> * regcache.h (cpy_no_passthrough): Remove it.
> (regcache_dup, regcache_cpy): Update comments.
>
> diff --git a/gdb/regcache.c b/gdb/regcache.c
> index 7eeb737..e8f92d6 100644
> --- a/gdb/regcache.c
> +++ b/gdb/regcache.c
> @@ -388,36 +388,9 @@ regcache_cpy (struct regcache *dst, struct regcache *src)
> gdb_assert (src != NULL && dst != NULL);
> gdb_assert (src->m_descr->gdbarch == dst->m_descr->gdbarch);
> gdb_assert (src != dst);
> - gdb_assert (src->m_readonly_p || dst->m_readonly_p);
> + gdb_assert (src->m_readonly_p && !dst->m_readonly_p);
>
> - if (!src->m_readonly_p)
> - regcache_save (dst, do_cooked_read, src);
> - else if (!dst->m_readonly_p)
> - dst->restore (src);
> - else
> - dst->cpy_no_passthrough (src);
> -}
> -
> -/* Copy/duplicate the contents of a register cache. Unlike regcache_cpy,
> - which is pass-through, this does not go through to the target.
> - Only values values already in the cache are transferred. The SRC and DST
> - buffers must not overlap. */
> -
> -void
> -regcache::cpy_no_passthrough (struct regcache *src)
> -{
> - gdb_assert (src != NULL);
> - gdb_assert (src->m_descr->gdbarch == m_descr->gdbarch);
> - /* NOTE: cagney/2002-05-17: Don't let the caller do a no-passthrough
> - move of data into a thread's regcache. Doing this would be silly
> - - it would mean that regcache->register_status would be
> - completely invalid. */
> - gdb_assert (m_readonly_p && src->m_readonly_p);
> -
> - memcpy (m_registers, src->m_registers,
> - m_descr->sizeof_cooked_registers);
> - memcpy (m_register_status, src->m_register_status,
> - m_descr->sizeof_cooked_register_status);
> + dst->restore (src);
> }
>
> struct regcache *
> diff --git a/gdb/regcache.h b/gdb/regcache.h
> index b416d5e..aa64a00 100644
> --- a/gdb/regcache.h
> +++ b/gdb/regcache.h
> @@ -369,8 +369,6 @@ private:
>
> void restore (struct regcache *src);
>
> - void cpy_no_passthrough (struct regcache *src);
> -
> enum register_status xfer_part (int regnum, int offset, int len, void *in,
> const void *out,
> decltype (regcache_raw_read) read,
> @@ -415,13 +413,12 @@ private:
> regcache_cpy (struct regcache *dst, struct regcache *src);
> };
>
> -/* Copy/duplicate the contents of a register cache. By default, the
> - operation is pass-through. Writes to DST and reads from SRC will
> - go through to the target. See also regcache_cpy_no_passthrough.
> -
> - regcache_cpy can not have overlapping SRC and DST buffers. */
> -
> +/* Duplicate the contents of a register cache to a read-only register
> + cache. The operation is pass-through. */
> extern struct regcache *regcache_dup (struct regcache *regcache);
> +
> +/* Writes to DEST will go through to the target. SRC is a read-only
> + register cache. */
> extern void regcache_cpy (struct regcache *dest, struct regcache *src);
>
> extern void registers_changed (void);