This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH 1/3] reggroups: Add test and docs for `info reg $reggroup` feature
- From: Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>
- To: Stafford Horne <shorne at gmail dot com>, GDB patches <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 12:17:02 +0100
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] reggroups: Add test and docs for `info reg $reggroup` feature
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- Authentication-results: ext-mx02.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com
- Authentication-results: ext-mx02.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=palves at redhat dot com
- Dkim-filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com 8A3AB7D0F2
- Dmarc-filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 8A3AB7D0F2
- References: <cover.1496871270.git.shorne@gmail.com> <83413241fe0897c873b1cc6e18ccbec78a7a2a25.1496871270.git.shorne@gmail.com>
On 06/07/2017 11:15 PM, Stafford Horne wrote:
> +@item info registers @var{reggroup} @dots{}
> +Print the name and value of the restiers in each of the specified
> +@var{reggroup}. The @var{reggoup} can be any of those returned by
> +@code{maint print reggroups}.
Not a blocker, but seems odd to be suggesting maintenance commands
to users. Should we add a "info reggroups" or some such command?
Thanks,
Pedro Alves