This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] gdb.base/siginfo-thread.exp: Increase timeout for 'gcore' command


Pedro Alves wrote:
On 03/16/2017 07:10 PM, Wei-min Pan wrote:

You mean that by hand it went faster than that?
So what is GDB doing differently when run via make check
that makes it slower than running by hand?
Yes, but not by much faster:

% cat in
run
gcore tmp.gcore
quit

% time my_gdb siginfo-thread -x in
...
real    0m13.327s
user    0m3.504s
sys     0m7.572s

Either I'm missing something, or that was _slower_ than then
number you shown of running via the testsuite, not faster...

Sorry, you didn't miss anything. I misspoke :)
So WDT is GDB doing that takes that long?  Is that writing
the core to a slow NFS mount or something?

Here that takes:

 real    0m0.120s
 user    0m0.090s
 sys     0m0.033s

and this is not a state-of-the-art machine.

Can you guess the next question?

Pick any other core test in the testsuite, do the
same and compare the numbers.

And if they're different, the next question would
then be, "what's different in this test, why's
it slower?".
OK, just tried a different test which is similar to siginfo-thread:

% time make check TESTS="*/siginfo-obj.exp"
...
real    0m1.282s
user    0m0.736s
sys     0m0.400s

Looks like the slowness had something to do with the pthread libs.
Will investigate. Thanks.
If they're similar, then, well, the same question.  :-)

Thanks,
Pedro Alves



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]