This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[pushed] gdb: no longer define __STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS/__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS (Re: [PATCH] Update gnulib to current upstream master)


On 10/12/2016 05:12 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 10/12/2016 05:09 PM, Yao Qi wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 4:17 PM, Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> I tried building gdb with G++ 4.7 and CXX="g++ -std=gnu+11", and that
>>> tripped on a build error:
>>
>> GDB source requires C++03 compiler, but it should be built with recent
>> compiler with recent C++ standard.
>>
>> Patch is good to me, but let us leave this patch here for one day or two
>> for the purpose of collecting comments or objections.
> 
> Related to C++11?  That was that motivated the update this time,
> but we should routinely update gnulib _anyway_.  This allows reverting:
> 
>  commit e063da67902e2ba03cfc6f7381694f4c6a72ecf4
>  Author:     Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
>  AuthorDate: Tue Nov 17 15:17:45 2015 +0000
> 
>      [C++] Define __STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS / __STDC_LIMIT_MACROS for stdint.h
> 
> for example, since my gnulib fix has gone into master
> upstream meanwhile.

I've pushed in the gnulib merge to master now.  In addition, I've
pushed in the following patch as well:

>From f6abaf7a4088dc9a5d73ee2233246347af9181d5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 20:48:37 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] gdb: no longer define __STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS/__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS

My gnulib fix at:
  https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2015-11/msg00010.html
was merged upstream meanwhile and our gnulib copy now includes it.

As a coincidence, Kevin was telling me today that these macros are
causing a build problem on FreeBSD:

common/common-defs.h:47:0: error: "__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS" redefined [-Werror]
  #define __STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS 1
  /usr/include/sys/cdefs.h:408:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition
  #define __STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS
(and a similar error for __STDC_LIMIT_MACROS)

The problem seems to be that we should be defining these input macros
before including any system header, but, we're not.

So let's just revert e063da67902e ([C++] Define __STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS
/ __STDC_LIMIT_MACROS for stdint.h).  If this causes a problem
somewhere, we can re-define the macros higher up in the file, before
system headers are included.

gdb/ChangeLog:
2016-10-18  Pedro Alves  <palves@redhat.com>

	* common/common-defs.h (__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS)
	(__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS): Delete.
---
 gdb/ChangeLog            |  5 +++++
 gdb/common/common-defs.h | 16 ----------------
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gdb/ChangeLog b/gdb/ChangeLog
index 7dd1b32..80215df 100644
--- a/gdb/ChangeLog
+++ b/gdb/ChangeLog
@@ -1,5 +1,10 @@
 2016-10-18  Pedro Alves  <palves@redhat.com>
 
+	* common/common-defs.h (__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS)
+	(__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS): Delete.
+
+2016-10-18  Pedro Alves  <palves@redhat.com>
+
 	* gnulib/update-gnulib.sh (GNULIB_COMMIT_SHA1): Set to
 	2692e23a48e21f6daa029e8af9f1a143b7532f47.
 	* gnulib/configure, gnulib/config.in, gnulib/aclocal.m4:
diff --git a/gdb/common/common-defs.h b/gdb/common/common-defs.h
index 5426dd5..9b5d853 100644
--- a/gdb/common/common-defs.h
+++ b/gdb/common/common-defs.h
@@ -31,23 +31,7 @@
 #include <stdio.h>
 #include <stdlib.h>
 #include <stddef.h>
-
-/* From:
-    https://www.gnu.org/software/gnulib/manual/html_node/stdint_002eh.html
-
-   "On some hosts that predate C++11, when using C++ one must define
-   __STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS to make visible the definitions of constant
-   macros such as INTMAX_C, and one must define __STDC_LIMIT_MACROS to
-   make visible the definitions of limit macros such as INTMAX_MAX."
-
-   gnulib doesn't fix this for us correctly yet.  See:
-     https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2015-11/msg00004.html
-
-   Meanwhile, explicitly define these ourselves, as C99 intended.  */
-#define __STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS 1
-#define __STDC_LIMIT_MACROS 1
 #include <stdint.h>
-
 #include <string.h>
 #ifdef HAVE_STRINGS_H
 #include <strings.h>	/* for strcasecmp and strncasecmp */
-- 
2.5.5



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]