Re: [PATCH] testsuite: Fix timeout issues during print of vla-arrays.

[Luis Machado <lgustavo at codesourcery dot com>]

On 02/22/2016 11:49 AM, Bernhard Heckel wrote:
> From: "bernhard.heckel" <bernhard.heckel@intel.com>
>
> Printing and resolving of dynamic array's causes sporadic timeout issues on loaded systems.
>
> 2016-02-12  Bernhard Heckel  <bernhard.heckel@intel.com>
>
> gdb/Changelog:
>
>       * vla-history.exp: Lookup array elements and printing exceeds timeout.
>
>
> Conflicts:
>
> 	gdb/testsuite/gdb.fortran/vla-history.exp
> 	gdb/testsuite/gdb.fortran/vla-value.exp
> ---
>   gdb/testsuite/gdb.fortran/vla-history.exp | 17 +++++++++--------
>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.fortran/vla-history.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.fortran/vla-history.exp
> index 1478e6b..2012961 100644
> --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.fortran/vla-history.exp
> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.fortran/vla-history.exp
> @@ -30,19 +30,20 @@ gdb_breakpoint [gdb_get_line_number "vla1-init"]
>   gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "vla1-init"
>   gdb_test "print vla1" " = <not allocated>" "print non-allocated vla1"
>
> -gdb_breakpoint [gdb_get_line_number "vla2-allocated"]
> -gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "vla2-allocated"
> -

Is the change above spurious? I see code being moved to higher timeout 
blocks, but the above doesn't seem to reappear anywhere. It was just 
deleted.

Did it cause problems?