This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [obv. PATCH 1/1] Fix build breakage
- From: Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>
- To: "Tedeschi, Walfred" <walfred dot tedeschi at intel dot com>
- Cc: "gdb-patches at sourceware dot org" <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2016 10:49:57 +0000
- Subject: Re: [obv. PATCH 1/1] Fix build breakage
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1455013458-14340-1-git-send-email-walfred dot tedeschi at intel dot com> <56B9BFF3 dot 7020905 at redhat dot com> <AC542571535E904D8E8ADAE745D60B194453709B at IRSMSX104 dot ger dot corp dot intel dot com>
On 02/09/2016 10:37 AM, Tedeschi, Walfred wrote:
> From: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org] On Behalf Of Pedro Alves
> How is this better than what Simon proposed?
> I haven't seem Simon's proposal, have just feel sorry to have caused this breakage, and tried to fix.
> Just noticed that with the e-mail from Sergio this early morning.
Simon's fix was quoted in Sergio's e-mail. :-)
> I will revert what I just pushed,
You reverted one patch unrelated patch too:
commit 0635c8759326e9431604b3359185cbf96740521d
Author: Walfred Tedeschi <walfred.tedeschi@intel.com>
Revert "Add a more helpful warning message to explain why some AArch64 relocations can overflow."
This reverts commit 2ea53e003163338a403d5afbb2046cafb8f3abe9.
I've reapplied 2ea53e003163 now, preserving the original author (for "git blame").
BTW, given you first fixed the C++ build, and then broke it again with
the revert, you should have gotten another e-mail from the buildbot
about C++ build breakage. Can you confirm whether you got one this time?
Thanks,
Pedro Alves