This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH 4/7] py-symbol: Require a frame for lookup_symbol only when necessary
- From: Phil Muldoon <pmuldoon at redhat dot com>
- To: jeffm at suse dot com, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 12:17:32 +0000
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] py-symbol: Require a frame for lookup_symbol only when necessary
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1454606973-31017-1-git-send-email-jeffm at suse dot com> <1454606973-31017-5-git-send-email-jeffm at suse dot com>
On 04/02/16 17:29, jeffm@suse.com wrote:
> From: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> > > gdbpy_lookup_symbol requires a frame prior to doing the symbol lookup but > a frame isn't necessary for many symbol types. Calling > symbol_read_needs_frame will tell us if it's necessary but we need to > have already looked up the symbol to use it. This patch puts the > lookup first and then only resolves the frame if one is required. > > This allows us to lookup static symbols directly from python rather > than using gdb.eval_and_parse.
Please add documentation and further tests for new functionality.
> --- > gdb/python/py-symbol.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++-------------- > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/gdb/python/py-symbol.c b/gdb/python/py-symbol.c > index cbbc9e2..c7f0ff8 100644 > --- a/gdb/python/py-symbol.c > +++ b/gdb/python/py-symbol.c > @@ -382,14 +382,28 @@ gdbpy_lookup_symbol (PyObject *self, PyObject *args, PyObject *kw) > > if (block_obj) > block = block_object_to_block (block_obj); > - else > + > + TRY > + { > + symbol = lookup_symbol (name, block, (domain_enum) domain, > + &is_a_field_of_this).symbol; > + } > + CATCH (except, RETURN_MASK_ALL) > + { > + GDB_PY_HANDLE_EXCEPTION (except); > + } > + END_CATCH > + > + if (symbol && !block) > { > struct frame_info *selected_frame; > > TRY > { > - selected_frame = get_selected_frame (_("No frame selected.")); > - block = get_frame_block (selected_frame, NULL); > + if
(symbol_read_needs_frame(symbol)) {
Formatting nit, space after function name and before (.
> + selected_frame = get_selected_frame (_("No frame selected.")); > + block = get_frame_block (selected_frame, NULL); > + } > } > CATCH (except, RETURN_MASK_ALL) > { > @@ -398,17 +412,6 @@ gdbpy_lookup_symbol (PyObject *self, PyObject *args, PyObject *kw) > END_CATCH > }
My only concern here is (and the context is not meaningful enough to
see), is that you've removed an "else" above which is an unconditional
branch, and replaced it with an IF instead. What happens when both IFs
can fail?
Cheers
Phil