This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH 13/17] btrace: non-stop
- From: Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>
- To: "Metzger, Markus T" <markus dot t dot metzger at intel dot com>
- Cc: "gdb-patches at sourceware dot org" <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 13:48:25 +0100
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/17] btrace: non-stop
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1441794909-32718-1-git-send-email-markus dot t dot metzger at intel dot com> <1441794909-32718-14-git-send-email-markus dot t dot metzger at intel dot com> <55F01DEC dot 4030209 at redhat dot com> <A78C989F6D9628469189715575E55B23331AB7A1 at IRSMSX104 dot ger dot corp dot intel dot com> <55F03852 dot 7030200 at redhat dot com> <A78C989F6D9628469189715575E55B23331AB873 at IRSMSX104 dot ger dot corp dot intel dot com> <55F04765 dot 9020206 at redhat dot com> <A78C989F6D9628469189715575E55B23331ACADF at IRSMSX104 dot ger dot corp dot intel dot com> <55F163DD dot 4050809 at redhat dot com> <A78C989F6D9628469189715575E55B23331ACE3E at IRSMSX104 dot ger dot corp dot intel dot com> <55F16A58 dot 8070403 at redhat dot com> <A78C989F6D9628469189715575E55B23331ACE75 at IRSMSX104 dot ger dot corp dot intel dot com>
On 09/10/2015 12:37 PM, Metzger, Markus T wrote:
>> Ah, I had totally misunderstood it! I thought you were saying that a
>> failing run took a bit long to trigger, so I left it running for a
>> while. In fact, I still had it running. :-)
>
> I meant that when a test fails, we are now waiting for the timeout.
> Before, we caught the error message. So running the test might take
> longer if there are fails.
Gotcha. I suggest only worrying about timeouts if/when we regress
at some point and decide that we need to xfail/kfail then.
>
> I forgot to mention that you need to revert one of the preceding
> patches to trigger a fail;-)
Thanks,
Pedro Alves