This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH] Uniquify test names from gdb.python/{py-objfile.exp,py-pp-registration.exp}
- From: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj at redhat dot com>
- To: GDB Patches <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 17:40:27 -0400
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Uniquify test names from gdb.python/{py-objfile.exp,py-pp-registration.exp}
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1437772393-6739-1-git-send-email-sergiodj at redhat dot com>
On Friday, July 24 2015, I wrote:
> While running some regression tests, I noticed that the two Python
> tests mentioned in the $SUBJECT contain non-unique names. This is a
> violation of our guidelines:
>
> <https://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/GDBTestcaseCookbook#Make_sure_test_messages_are_unique>
I went ahead and pushed this:
<https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2015-07/msg00195.html>
Let me know if there is any problem.
> And also makes things harder for BuildBot. So I hacked both testcases
> and made every test name unique. I guess this could be considered an
> obvious patch, but I decided to post it before pushing because others
> may have different opinions about the names.
>
> OK to apply?
>
> gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> 2015-07-24 Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
>
> * gdb.python/py-objfile.exp: Make some tests have unique names.
> * gdb.python/py-pp-registration.exp: Likewise.
> ---
> gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-objfile.exp | 15 +++++++++------
> gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-pp-registration.exp | 11 ++++++++---
> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-objfile.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-objfile.exp
> index 4de20c5..7dd094c 100644
> --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-objfile.exp
> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-objfile.exp
> @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ gdb_test "python print (objfile.username)" "${testfile}" \
> "Get objfile user name"
>
> gdb_test "python print (gdb.lookup_objfile (\"${testfile}\").filename)" \
> - "${testfile}"
> + "${testfile}" "print lookup_objfile filename"
> gdb_test "python print (gdb.lookup_objfile (\"junk\"))" \
> "Objfile not found\\.\r\n${python_error_text}"
>
> @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ if [string compare $binfile_build_id ""] {
> gdb_test "python print (objfile.build_id)" "$binfile_build_id" \
> "Get objfile build id"
> gdb_test "python print (gdb.lookup_objfile (\"$binfile_build_id\", by_build_id=True).filename)" \
> - "${testfile}"
> + "${testfile}" "print lookup_objfile filename by build-id"
> } else {
> unsupported "build-id is not supported by the compiler"
> }
> @@ -64,9 +64,11 @@ if [string compare $binfile_build_id ""] {
> # Other lookup_objfile_by_build_id tests we can do, even if compiler doesn't
> # support them.
> gdb_test "python print (gdb.lookup_objfile (\"foo\", by_build_id=True))" \
> - "Not a valid build id\\.\r\n${python_error_text}"
> + "Not a valid build id\\.\r\n${python_error_text}" \
> + "print invalid file lookup_objfile by build-id"
> gdb_test "python print (gdb.lookup_objfile (\"1234abcdef\", by_build_id=True))" \
> - "Objfile not found\\.\r\n${python_error_text}"
> + "Objfile not found\\.\r\n${python_error_text}" \
> + "print invalid file lookup_objfile by build-id 2"
>
> gdb_test "python print (objfile.progspace)" "<gdb\.Progspace object at .*>" \
> "Get objfile program space"
> @@ -104,7 +106,7 @@ if ![runto_main] {
> return 0
> }
>
> -gdb_py_test_silent_cmd "python objfile = gdb.objfiles()\[0\]" \
> +gdb_py_test_silent_cmd "python objfile = gdb.s()\[0\]" \
> "Get no-debug objfile file" 1
>
> gdb_test "python print (objfile.owner)" "None" \
> @@ -131,7 +133,8 @@ gdb_test "p main" "= {int \\(\\)} $hex <main>" \
> # Separate debug files are not findable.
> if { [get_python_valueof "sep_objfile.build_id" "None"] != "None" } {
> gdb_test "python print (gdb.lookup_objfile (sep_objfile.build_id, by_build_id=True))" \
> - "Objfile not found\\.\r\n${python_error_text}"
> + "Objfile not found\\.\r\n${python_error_text}" \
> + "print lookup_objfile of separate debug file"
> }
>
> # An objfile that was a symlink to a differently named file is still
> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-pp-registration.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-pp-registration.exp
> index 2193407..60f3436 100644
> --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-pp-registration.exp
> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-pp-registration.exp
> @@ -46,7 +46,8 @@ proc prepare_test { } {
> return 0
> }
>
> - gdb_test_no_output "python exec (open ('${remote_python_file}').read ())"
> + gdb_test_no_output "python exec (open ('${remote_python_file}').read ())" \
> + "read file"
>
> gdb_test_no_output "py progspace = gdb.current_progspace()"
> gdb_test_no_output "py my_pretty_printer1 = build_pretty_printer1()"
> @@ -108,9 +109,13 @@ with_test_prefix "replace" {
> gdb_test "py gdb.printing.register_pretty_printer(progspace, my_pretty_printer2, replace=False)" \
> "RuntimeError: pretty-printer already registered: pp-test\r\nError while executing Python code."
>
> - test_printers "s1"
> + with_test_prefix "test printers 1" {
> + test_printers "s1"
> + }
>
> gdb_test_no_output "py gdb.printing.register_pretty_printer(progspace, my_pretty_printer2, replace=True)"
>
> - test_printers "s2"
> + with_test_prefix "test printers 2" {
> + test_printers "s2"
> + }
> }
> --
> 2.4.3
--
Sergio
GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF 31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36
Please send encrypted e-mail if possible
http://sergiodj.net/