This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFC] Revisit PR 16253 ("Attempt to use a type name...")
- From: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>
- To: Keith Seitz <keiths at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org, dje at google dot com
- Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 21:53:44 +0200
- Subject: Re: [RFC] Revisit PR 16253 ("Attempt to use a type name...")
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1434049038-7891-1-git-send-email-keiths at redhat dot com> <20150617123357 dot GA12138 at host1 dot jankratochvil dot net> <5581972B dot 3020200 at redhat dot com> <5589A7F8 dot 7080406 at redhat dot com>
On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 20:39:52 +0200, Keith Seitz wrote:
> [But then my philosophy is "if it ain't broke, don't fix it." As far as
> I can tell, block_lookup_symbol is not "broke."]
I agree, just I think a proper fix would cover also block_lookup_symbol().
But then it is questionable what is a proper fix as after this fix the C++
expression support still remains poor. The proper GDB fix is C++ 'compile'
support being worked on.
Jan