This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Sync readline to version 6.3 patchlevel 8
- From: Doug Evans <dje at google dot com>
- To: Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>, Patrick Palka <patrick at parcs dot ath dot cx>, gdb-patches <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 08:47:08 -0500
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Sync readline to version 6.3 patchlevel 8
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1431562331-20448-1-git-send-email-patrick at parcs dot ath dot cx> <CADPb22RQi=S3ygBGL-b5+XD=Eyz+aKeQXmjE+5iSiazA-=4M7Q at mail dot gmail dot com> <CA+C-WL9Nqa7G4Wh1kszePEjQ5HwFNT5MsX+J5GFCswNDY1GPVQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <CADPb22SQpS1qwJ-uWQ+=JC-Z62YQBY9xGjxMRpx-2oEQHMuyiA at mail dot gmail dot com> <20150516152514 dot GA12510 at host1 dot jankratochvil dot net> <CADPb22RM_eoDuOMi-t01A5gJUme5uYf+MfvvbDJzASieqETKEg at mail dot gmail dot com> <55829FE7 dot 1060908 at redhat dot com>
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 5:39 AM, Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 05/16/2015 04:51 PM, Doug Evans wrote:
>> On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 8:25 AM, Jan Kratochvil
>> <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> On Sat, 16 May 2015 17:23:23 +0200, Doug Evans wrote:
>>>> Another thought is that IWBN if the reapplication of local patches was
>>>> a separate commit.
>>>
>>> IIUC this would break git bisect.
>>
>> It might. Bleah.
>>
>> What's the "git" way to do this (*1) that doesn't involve a lot of
>> manual effort?
>> ---
>> (*1): "this" being extracting out individual local patches later in
>> time (say a year from now).
>
> I guess that would be a git merge of the branch that contains
> the local patches. We don't allow merge commits in our
> repo though.
>
> I think that easiest next best is to put the unsquashed application
> of the local patches in a branch (just like users/ppalka/readline-6.3-update),
> and apply the squashed version to master. For the next update, we can
> find the initial local patches in the branch.
fwiw, I'm not comfortable with needing to rely on personal branches
for pretty much anything.
Can we make an official readline merging branch?
[assuming using a branch is how we want to solve this]