This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Doug Evans <dje@google.com> writes: > I would have expected syscalls/Makefile.in, > with requisite changes to generate Makefile in some configure.ac file. Hi Doug, I saw your other message and I'll surely answer and apply your suggestions as soon as I can, but let me make a quick question and comment on my design here :) I tried to follow the exact same design we have in gdb/Features. There, we only have a Makefile that doesn't depend on the configure script. If I understand correctly, all it takes to generate the files is a simple 'make blah'. I tried to reproduce this behavior here. Even though I understand the obvious benefits of using the configure script, is there any actual differences between the expected behavior in gdb/Features/Makefile that justifies it being a simple Makefile? If not, I'll probably work on a follow-up patch adjusting it, as well. Btw, can any of you guys provide me with more information about the maintainers mode? I couldn't find many explanations in the Internals wiki. I can update the wiki once I have a better understanding of it. -- Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |